In the article, “Students Need a Digital Driver’s License
Before They Start Their Engines,” authors Gerry Swan and Marty Park discuss The
Digital Driver’s License (DDL) project, which is designed to educate students
about digital citizenship. “The US
Children’s Internet Protection Act (CIPA) and Protecting Children in the 21st
Century Act emphasize schools’ responsibility to educate students about
internet safety” (pp. 26); the DDL is designed to help educators do just that
by tracking students’ progress on a set of self-paced cases. “The DDL has five core cases and one final
cumulative license case that captures the skill sets of nine elements of
digital citizenship, as outlined in Mike Ribble and Gerald Bailey’s book Digital Citizenship in Schools”
(26). Using two types of assessments,
the “practice-its” and “prove-its,” the DDL cases, or modules, expose students
to information regarding digital etiquette, digital communications, security,
digital access, health and wellness, digital commerce, media fluency and
digital law, rights and responsibilities.
I think that the DDL should be mandated in all schools which
allow students to use technology, in or outside the classroom. Exposing students to these ethical and legal
behaviors, which are expected of them in the NETS-S standards for digital
citizenship, at a young age will help to ensure ethical and legal behavior
throughout their learning and professional careers. In my future classroom, I would use this at
the beginning of the year to create accountability for internet and device use;
being sure that kids know that plagiarism, cyber bullying and online safety are
serious issues will probably help to deter immoral conduct.
I did see a couple of negatives within this particular article. I see the tracking of a student’s digital
citizenry by a private company as just one more instance of corporate profiteering
from student information. If these kinds
of programs either generated funds for the schools which implement them or if
these kinds of programs are developed for non-profit use, I would see no
problem with it. Another issue that I found
was blocking access to students who didn’t complete the modules; this seems
unethical on the part of the schools because it prevents students from learning
everything they might need to. I
understand that access would only be blocked on devices provided by the school,
but that could still alienate some students.
Read the article here: Students Need a Digital Driver's License before They Start Their Engines
Park, M. & Swan, G. (2012-2013) Students need a digital
driver’s license before they start their engines. Learning &Leading with Technology, 40(4), 26-28.
A digital driver's license sounds like an interesting idea! I'm glad that I personally didn't discover the internet until I was mature enough to make good(ish) decisions, and I worry that young people might be doing things they will later regret online. I think it is a good idea for schools to restrict internet access unless students can pass a DDL course. Thanks for the interesting post; I did not know that something like this existed.
ReplyDeleteWith or without a digital driver's license, students need to learn about and practice digital citizenship. Having a license makes it formal. Not a bad idea. But a more important thing is action. Knowing about something is different than actually doing it. The license is just a start. All should continue to behave and be a good digital citizenship. When a license is used, it needs to be renewed in a certain period of time.
ReplyDeleteRong-Ji